Challenges in the applicability of ontological models of managerial competences in health: A scoping review
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Objective: Identify challenges in the applicability of ontological models that represent relationships and elements of health management competencies. Methods: Scoping Review, according to Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and the guiding question: “What are the challenges in the applicability of ontological models that represent the health management competencies described in health in the literature?”. Included national and international studies, English, Portuguese and Spanish, in the time span of 2015 to 2020. Results: The search strategy was applied in eight databases; 2024 articles were found and eight were selected as the final sample. The studies highlighted the following difficulties in this theoretical framework: interpretation of complex, heterogeneous and dispersed data by health managers, lack of automation in patient monitoring, lack of training of health managers, inadequate task distribution and workload of the nursing team and also, deficiency in decision-making shared between health professionals and the patient. Conclusions: The application of ontological models in health management systems resulted in time optimization, data integration and better management decision-making in order to positively help the work of health professionals and managers.
Health Management, Ontological Models, Management Capacity, Health Planning, Health Evaluationgestão em saúde, modelos ontológicos, capacidade de gestão, planejamento em saúde, avaliação em saúdegestão em saúde, modelos ontológicos, capacidade de gestão, planejamento em saúde, avaliação em saúde
1. Christopoulou S, Kotsilieris T, Anagnostopoulos I. A health care monitoring system that uses ontology agents. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic and Social Media Adaptation and Personalization (SMAP). [Internet] 2016 [cited 2020 Dec 3];41-5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/SMAP.2016.7753382
2. Ongenae F, Vanhove T, De Backere F, De Turck F. Intelligent task management platform for health care workers. Taylor & Francis. [Internet] 2017 [cited 2020 Dec 16];42(2):122-34. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3109/17538157.2015.1113178
3. Minjiang G, Hongpu H, Xingyun L. Application of Ontology Technology in Health Statistic Data Analysis. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. [Internet] 2017 [cited 2020 Dec 2];245:915-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-830-3-915
4. Ajami H, Mcheick H, Mustapha K. A pervasive healthcare system for COPD patients. Diagnostics. [Internet] 2019 [cited 2020 Dec 4];9(4). Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fdiagnostics9040135
5. Bajenaru L. An Ontology-based e-Learning Approach for the Healthcare Management System. eLearning & Software for Education. [Internet] 2018 [cited 2020 Dec 3];356-62. Available from: https://doi.org/10.12753/2066-026X-21-049
6. Alahmar A, Crupi ME, Benlamri R. Ontological framework for standardizing and digitizing clinical pathways in healthcare information systems. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. [Internet] 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 4];196. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105559
7. Yamada DB, Yoshiura VT, Brandão Miyoshi NS, Lima IB, Usumoto Shinoda GY, Charters Lopes Rijo RP et al. Proposal of an ontology for Mental Health Management in Brazil. Procedia Computer Science. [Internet] 2018 [cited 2020 Dec 2];138:137-42. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.020
8. Parimbelli E, Wilk S, Kingwell S, Andreev P, Michalowski W. Shared Decision-Making Ontology for a Healthcare Team Executing a Workflow, an Instantiation for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression Management. AMIA-Annual Symposium Proceedings. [Internet] 2018 [cited 2020 Dec 18]; 2018:877-86. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30815130
9. Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil, H. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. [Internet] 2020 Jun [cited 2021 Feb 26];11:407-52. Available from: https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-01
10. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, Brien KKO, Colquhoun H. R ESEARCH AND R EPORTING M ETHODS PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. [Internet] 2018 [cited 2021 Feb 26]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
11. Teixeira LMD, Almeida MB. Aspectos ontológicos e epistemológicos em terminologias clínicas: em busca de interoperabilidade semântica no ambiente clínico. Encontros Bibli: Rev Eletrôn de Bibliot e Ciênc da Inform. [Internet] 2019 [cited 2021 Abr 30]; 24(55):1-21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2019.e57996
12. Cunha SGS, Siman AG, Brito MJM. A comunicação como recurso para tomada de decisão de gestores da unidade de atendimento imediato. Braz J Hea Rev. [Internet] 2020 [cited 2021 Mai 25]; 3(2):2374-83. Available from: https://doi.org/10.34119/bjhrv3n2-087
13. Rosales-Huamani JA, Castillo-Sequera JL, Larroca FP, Abanto AL, Rotta LZ. Uma Revisão de Modelos Ontológicos Aplicados ao Atendimento de Pessoas com Deficiência. Preprints. [Internet] 2020 [cited 2023 Ago 18]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202003.0383.v1
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.