Published Sep 5, 2019



PLUMX
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar


Nathalia Andrea Montenegro Molina

Diego Alejandro Coronado Sabogal https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3904-5874

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Abstract

Under the categorization of the insurance contract as a standard form or type contract, an extensive legal analysis has been unleashed around the equilibrium and contractual imbalance, the negotiation dynamics and the economic position of each of the parties, due to its particular nature and development of mass marketing, being the context propitious for the insertion of the so-called ‘unfair terms’ or ‘abusive clauses’.


Motivated by this setting, the essay auscultates the elements that influence the identification and subsequent declaration of a clause as abusive, it explores as well its interpretation in the insurance contract in Colombia. The foregoing, under the understanding that current legislation and, in a large extent, the judges, have accepted a classic position on the dominant position held by the insurer, ignoring situations where it is precisely the opposing party who imposes conditions by their economic characteristics.


Consequently, to carry out the above-mentioned propositive examination, the authors make a brief historical review of the emergence of what has been considered abusive clauses around the world, as well as the description of the current regulatory framework on them in the Republic of Colombia. Subsequently, the text elucidates the evolution of the national jurisprudence towards the construction of the concept of abusive clauses, the criteria for identifying them and their scope in the courts’ pronouncements related to the insurance contract.

Keywords

abusive clauses; consumer law; contractual imbalance; insurance contract; dominant position.Cláusulas abusivas; contrato de seguro; derecho de consumo; desequilibrio contractual; posición dominante.

References
BARRERA TAPIAS, C.D, 2012. El derecho de las obligaciones. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.

BESSON, A, 1950. Le Contrat d’assurance et la morale, Etudes offertes á G.Ripert, Librairie Générale du Droit et de Jurisprudence.

CÁRDENAS MEJÍA, J.P, 2009. La protección del contratante y la evolución del derecho contemporáneo, Responsabilidad Civil y del Estado. NO.9, IARCE.

DIAZ-GRANADOS, J.M, 2012. El nuevo estatuto del consumidor. Su incidencia en el Contrato de Seguro, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Revista Ibero-latinoamericana de Seguros, 67-70.

GALVIS, S, 2001, La protección a tomadores y asegurados, Evolución y perspectivas del contrato de seguro en Colombia (1974-2001), Asociación Colombiana de Derecho de Seguros.

HONDIUS, E, 1988, Clauses abusives dans les contrats de consommation: vers une directive européenne, Revue européenne de droit de la consommation.

LAGUADO, C, 2003. Condiciones Generales, cláusulas abusivas y el principio de buena fé en el Contrato de Seguro, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Revista Ibero-latinoamericana de Seguros. 235-250.

LÓPEZ BLANCO, H.F, 2014. Comentarios al Contrato de Seguro, DUPRE.

MANKO, R,2013. Unfair contract terms in EU law, Library of the European Parliament.

MONROY, M.G, 2018. Introducción al Derecho, Editorial TEMIS.

ORDOÑEZ ORDOÑEZ, A.E, (Ed. Académico), JURISPRUDENCIA DE SEGUROS: Corte Suprema de Justicia 1971-2000, Asociación Colombiana de Derecho de Seguros (ACOLDESE), Federación de Aseguradores Colombianos (FASECOLDA).
How to Cite
Montenegro Molina, N. A., & Coronado Sabogal, D. A. (2019). The Unfair Terms in the Insurance Contract: The path undertaken in order to consolidate its proper identification and interpretation in the Colombian legal system. Revista Ibero-Latinoamericana De Seguros, 28(50), 241–291. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.ris50.cacs
Section
Análisis jurisprudencial - Especialización en Derecho de Seguros Pontificia Universidad Javeriana